Why aren't smart selections reliable?

Our Smart Selections are pure horse racing systems. There's a set of criteria, and the system pulls out all the horses that meet the criteria.

We prefer the term strategy, as it indicates that they should be used as part of your own research, and not blindly follow.

With this in mind, why aren't our Smart Selections reliable? Having just said that our SS are basically systems, here's why Horse Racing Systems may not always be reliable:

Complexity of Variables

Horse racing involves a multitude of variables, such as horse form (Form Ratings uses over 100 form factors alone), jockey performance, track conditions, distance preferences, and more.

Creating a system that accurately predicts winners based on all these variables can be extremely complex.

Changing Conditions

Conditions on race day, including weather, track conditions, and even the horse's mood, can significantly impact race outcomes.

Systems that rely solely on historical data might not account for these dynamic factors.

Animal Element

Horses are living beings, and their performances can be affected by factors that are difficult to quantify, such as injuries, emotional state, and even luck.

These unpredictable elements make it challenging to create a foolproof system.

Statistical Noise

Horse racing data is often filled with statistical noise. It's possible for a horse to win a race due to a rare combination of factors that might not be replicable.

Overfitting (creating a system that's too specific to past data) is a risk, as it might not hold up in future races.

Public Knowledge

If a system becomes widely known and used, it can impact betting odds. Bookmakers adjust odds based on where money is being placed, potentially reducing the system's effectiveness as odds change.

Evolving Competition

The horse racing landscape is always changing, with new horses, jockeys, trainers, and strategies entering the scene.

Systems that don't adapt to these changes might become outdated.

Sample Size and Bias

Depending on the amount of data available, a system might not have a large enough sample size to make accurate predictions. Additionally, if the data is biased or incomplete, the system's conclusions may be skewed.

Unpredictable Outcomes:

Horse racing, like any sport, can have unexpected and unlikely outcomes. Longshots and underdogs can win, and favorites can falter. These surprises can challenge the predictions made by even the most sophisticated systems.

In summary, horse racing systems may struggle to consistently produce accurate predictions due to the complex, dynamic, and unpredictable nature of the sport. While data analysis and systems can provide valuable insights, they often cannot account for all the nuances and variables that influence race outcomes.

Which is why we refer to our Horse Racing Systems as Strategies, and help to educate our members how to use our ratings to make better betting decisions.

If we can use the Form Ratings to narrow down who won't win, Lay Betting is also worth considering as well.

See our Lay Betting on the Horses article to learn all about how to laying horses.

Did this answer your question? Thanks for the feedback There was a problem submitting your feedback. Please try again later.

Still need help? Contact Us Contact Us